SEC Guidance on Common Financial Reporting Issues Facing Smaller Reporting Companies

The SEC recently posted to its website a slide deck (PDF) from a staff presentation at the Forums on Auditing in the Small Business Environment.  The slides describe, among other things, some of the issues that the SEC frequently encounters in periodic filings made by smaller reporting companies.

When commenting on the periodic reports of smaller reporting companies, the SEC generally requests:

  • additional information;
  • additional or clarifying disclosure in future filings; or
  • filing amendments to revise financial statements or disclosure.

Continue Reading

Exchange Roadblocks to Going Public in Reverse Are Now in Place

In August 2011, we commented on proposals by the major national securities exchanges to impose additional listing requirements on companies completing a reverse merger with a shell companyThe SEC announced earlier this month that it approved each of the rule changes, as amended, on an accelerated basis.  It just became significantly harder for the shares of a reverse-merger shell company to become listed.

Continue Reading

MIND THE GAAP: The Auditor's Dilemma

Audit firms are smack in the middle of the tension between U.S. and Chinese regulators with respect to allegations of accounting fraud at Chinese companies traded on U.S. exchanges.  At present, a Chinese affiliate of Deloitte is in the uncomfortable limelight for its work auditing Longtop Financial Technologies.

Continue Reading

Mind the GAAP: Chinese Internet Companies Feeling the Pain

Investor sentiment stemming from allegations of accounting fraud at a host of Chinese companies listed on U.S. exchanges is spreading.  As reported by the Wall Street Journal, the shift in sentiment is “sharp,” and investors have “dumped the stocks of some of China’s biggest Internet companies.”  In the past, investors may have been willing to overlook questionable corporate governance and reporting.  This is particularly true for Chinese Internet companies, whose increased profits reflect the recent social media craze.  But growing concern about business risks and financial instability has caused damage to share prices of Chinese companies – even when those companies are free of  accusations of wrongdoing.

Continue Reading

Mind the GAAP: Regulator Talks to Continue

In the continuing wake of fraud and accounting irregularities at Chinese companies listed on U.S. exchanges, negotiations that began last month between U.S. regulators and their Chinese counterparts (as we discussed in July 2011) are expected to resume in October 2011.

Continue Reading

New Roadblock to Going Public in Reverse

Soon it may just be a little harder to go public through a reverse merger transaction.  The SEC published proposed rule changes from both the New York Stock Exchange (PDF) and NYSE Amex (PDF) on Aug. 4, 2011 that, if approved, may make you reconsider the reverse-merger route and probably makes the shell-company industry wince.

Continue Reading

Mind the GAAP: Addressing Fraud Trends at Chinese Companies

Last month we noted a trend concerning fraud and accounting irregularities at NYSE- and Nasdaq-listed Chinese companies.  The trend is not being ignored:  on July 11 and 12, representatives from the SEC and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) met with representatives from the China Securities Regulatory Commission and China’s Finance Ministry.   The SEC and the PCAOB (which oversees audit firms) are seeking cross-border oversight that would allow U.S. examiners to inspect audit firms in China, which Chinese officials have claimed violates China’s existing laws relating to state secrets.  But whether China can afford to resist such access cannot be ignored: according to Bloomberg, “Chinese companies listed in the U.S. have had $4.1 billion wiped off their market value this year amid a wave of auditor resignations and fraud allegations by short-sellers . . . .”

Continue Reading

Mind the GAAP: Chinese Companies Under Fire for Accounting Fraud

The SEC recently initiated stop order proceedings against China Intelligent Lighting and Electronics Inc. and China Century Dragon Media Inc. on suspicion of accounting fraud.  As reported by The New York Times, both companies failed to disclose that their independent auditors resigned after asking questions about the accuracy of the companies’ financial statements.

A number of Chinese companies have come under fire for accounting fraud stemming from corporate governance issues according to Forbes: “[i]n the past six months alone, more than 25 [NYSE and Nasdaq]-listed Chinese companies have disclosed accounting discrepancies or seen their auditors resign.”  In light of these discrepancies and departures, the need for increased transparency, strong risk management and broad financial oversight is greater than ever.  In particular, Chinese companies have been criticized for their relatively low number of independent directors (33% of the directors of Chinese-listed companies compared to 75% of the directors of U.S.-listed companies) and the lack of relevant industry experience these independent directors offer. 

In one recent case involving Chinese financial software company Longtop Financial Technologies Limited, auditor Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu handed Longtop a resignation letter, included as an exhibit to a Form 6-K filed by Longtop, that asserted financial statement fraud, bank corruption and threats against the auditors.  The New York Times explained the breakup as an investigation by Deloitte, after six years of clean audit opinions, into Longtop’s cash balances.  Longtop blocked Deloitte from following up with bank headquarters regarding cash balances (that bank branches had already confirmed) by telling the bank that Deloitte was not the company’s auditor and threatening to hold Deloitte staff captive unless Deloitte allowed Longtop to retain Deloitte’s audit files.  As described in the resignation letter, Longtop’s chairman Jia Xiao Gong, explained to a Deloitte partner why Deloitte could not find the cash:  “there were [sic] fake revenue in the past so there were [sic] fake cash recorded on the books.”  That is a disturbing clarification.

OUR TAKE:  Sound accounting practices and the independence and experience of directors are of paramount importance to sound corporate governance.  Foreign companies, which bring with them different regulatory, governance and financial backgrounds and standards, may pose unique risks for U.S. investors.  Investors should pay close attention to corporate governance and accounting issues generally, but especially with respect to less familiar foreign companies.  Reports identifying trends with respect to corporate governance deficiencies and/or accounting fraud especially raise investment red flags.